Chinese Invasion

THE SINICISATION OF AUSTRALIA.

Between 2011 and 2016 censuses, the Chinese population of Australia grew from 866,001 to 1,214, 438.  That is a lot in a population of only 24 million. The Chinese are not on a par with the muslims and Africans, of course, but it still matters very much.  As the aborigines can tell us, an invasion by any race or culture loses you your country.

I rather like the Chinese and am comfortable with them.  They are not alien like the muslims and Africans. Chinese do not breed like rabbits nor live off the taxpayer.  But numbers and groups matter. There is a world of difference between a small minority and a big minority - or a minority that becomes a majority.

The Chinese government sees overseas Chinese as an arm of the Chinese state and is already using them as such in Australia - bribing politicians (e.g. Sam Dastyari) and parties, protesting and lobbying, and Chinese front organisations. Might the Chinese government, in the not too distant future, demand that Australia take much bigger numbers of Chinese?

All this must leave Australian born Chinese conflicted but it is groups not individuals which matter.

What matters far more than the machinations of the Chinese government is that if some other race, religion or culture moves into a country, by invasion or migration, then it first changes the nature of the country. An Australia with an overwhelmingly white population is not the same country as one in which whites are just a minority.

Then, as the numbers grow, the country becomes the country of the invaders. We whites are well on the pathway to become white abos.

Our minds and focus are on the muslim threat but that does not mean that we can ignore the Chinese and Asian invasion. An Australia dominated by the Chinese would be light years better than one run by muslims but but it would still be a country we have lost. We must take back our country - from everyone.

Terminology Matters - muslim

Speaking of “radical Islam” is wrong as that term implies there is some other Islam somewhere which is just fine.  There is not.  As Turkish president Erdogan always says, there is just Islam.

Similarly with “Islamist terrorist”.  No, the correct term is “muslim”.  Those two Australian girls killed at London Bridge were killed by muslims.  Being muslim is what mattered.  It is what made them terrorists. Being terrorists is an outcome of being muslim.

Using the word “muslim” brings it home what the problem is, whom the problem people are. Words like “radical”, “Islamic”, “Islamist” and “radicalised” suggest people on the periphery.  “Muslim” places them at the centre.

A Little White Lie and Lacey Schwartz

I recently watched a PBS documentary entitled, A Little White Lie, about an African-American woman, Lacey Schwartz, who grew up thinking she was white even though any mirror could have told her otherwise. (Ironically, Schwartz is German for black.)

When Lacey was born to her white Jewish parents - she was dark. Brown. Instead of drawing the rather obvious conclusion, the fact that her father’s grandfather had been a swarthy Sicilian was seized upon as an explanation.

So Lacey grew up white. This was not a matter of passing for white nor pretending. It was a denial of the obvious physical facts. Her parents, Robert and Peggy Schwartz, and their kin, told Lacey she was white and behaved as though she was. The whole family was in denial - though surely some may have been more realistic and just played along.

Woodstock, where Lacey grew up was a white, liberal community. When she went to high school in a more mixed community perception and reality started to get out of sync. Lacey still saw herself as white, though the black students there could see she was black. When Lacey went to Georgetown University, the facade collapsed and Lacey finally realised she was black.

Her parents’ marriage fell apart before that. At long last, Lacey’s “father” had faced up to the fact of his wife’s adultery and his wife had to admit to that adultery. (Even the mother had grasped at the straw of Sicilian ancestry.)  How could the father have been so slow, so naive?

The Peggy Schwartz had been having an affair with a black man, one Rodney Parker. That started in 1968 prior to her marriage and lasted at the very least until Lacey’s birth, very probably later. Lacey was born in 1977. Did the affair ever end?

Did Peggy and Robert decide that she should go off the pill so they could have a child? If so, she could have put Parker on hold for awhile but did not. The documentary did not cover this so I can only guess as to the circumstances, but she would hardly have been the first woman to not care just which man got her pregnant.

Amazing though the denial was, the really interesting part is the two things the story says about the wife, Peggy - and about some other wives.

Firstly, Peggy’s attitude: what she had done was No Big Deal. Nothing. She did not seem to have any comprehension - none whatsoever - that a wife fucking another man, year in year out, was wrong. It was as though the piece of brain that might have told her so was missing. Peggy Schwartz just liked what she was doing. After all those years, the sex must have been routine so maybe she just enjoyed the deceit.

Peggy merely commented that if her daughter was not black, no one would have been the wiser. No problem. Her daughter asked her why, if she was so keen on Rodney Parker, she did not leave her husband for him. Peggy said that Robert was a much more fun and interesting person to live with - and he was paid much more money than Rodney. Robert was a meal ticket.

Secondly, the type of person Peggy presented as:  innocent, trustworthy. When the child was born, and growing up, it should have been obvious to her husband what had happened. Apparently his mind just could not conceive that his wife would be unfaithful. No, she was not that type of woman. Well, she was.

What a delusion - but a common one amongst men.

I have, over the years, noticed this in other cases. When some wife is revealed as an adulteress, everyone is shocked. No, not her, so sweet and innocent and good. Butter would not melt in her mouth.  Such deceit with such an innocent face.

It is expected that if the wife is an adulteress there must be some reason - a loveless, unhappy marriage or an unfaithful husband. Sometimes that is so, but not necessarily. Some just like fucking someone else. This Peggy Schwartz was one such and she made no claim otherwise.

The husband, Robert, was a weakling, a wuss. Why else did he go into such denial? And why else, after decades of betrayal, did he not put a bullet in the wife?

Marhaba

An Arabic-speaking German named Constantin Schreiber has set up an Arabic TV show entitled Marhaba (Hello). Its purpose is to teach refugees about Germany, German life and the German way of doing things. All very worthy.

However, he himself tells of going to a refugee camp in Germany and not being welcomed by all there. Muslims see his show as a conspiracy mechanism of forced assimilation. Clearly, they do not want to be assimilated. Surprise! Surprise!

Schreiber quoted a muslim preacher as saying, “First they talk to you in Arabic then they take away your veils.” And these are the people Schreiber wants to live in Germany.

source: The Sydney Morning Herald, 28-9 January 2017

Moderate muslims. Really?

My mother used to know a Jordanian muslim woman and her family. Some fucking do-gooder organisation had asked mum to help this immigrant family to settle in.

The family included a young daughter, ten years old or so. My mother asked the muslim mother what they would do if their daughter wanted to marry someone they did not want her to marry. The muslim mother was horrified and said that they would kill the daughter. When mum pointed out that you could not do that in Australia, the mother said they would take the daughter back to Jordan. To kill her there?

The significance of this is that these muslims were not radicalised nor extremist muslims. They were “moderate” muslims, civilised, supposedly. The husband had trained as an engineer in the United States.

Just because a muslim is not a terrorist nor  a Jihadi does not mean he is just fine, just like us. All muslims are alien. None belong in civilised countries.

Female Genital Mutilation - Australia

I used to be a civilian employee of the Queensland Police. I recollect that, in about 1999, an email came around noting various changes to the Queensland Criminal Code. Amongst the amendments were several criminalising female genital mutilation. The law was commendably tough. However, I though to myself, "not so very long ago we did not need such legislation".

The best solution to this and similar problems is to not allow backward races, cultures and religions to exist in Australia.

Multiculturalism and Zubrzycki’s Pillars

Jerzy Zubrzycki is not a name that springs to mind. He is not, and was not, well known, but he was important. Professor Jerzy Zubrzycki was considered to be the architect of multiculturalism in Australia and, as such, he came up with four pillars:

1. social cohesion
2. equality of opportunity
3. obligations and rights that we all have
4. cultural identity.

Perfectly reasonable. Pretty obvious. We whites have no difficulty in accepting them. (I would say though that as a definition of a nation they are necessary but not sufficient, but that does not matter here.)

I saw Zubrzycki on television during the 1998 Federal election campaign. I recollect him admitting that that multiculturalism had failed. The reason being that too many of the groups entering Australia did not accept these pillars. 

Whites believe in tolerance and not being racist or discriminatory. The problem is that only whites think that way. White liberals are too stupid to understand that.