Australia should be ...

Australia should be:

• white
• federal
• industrial and
• culturally Christian.

It does not have to be 100.00% white. And there are, of course, the indigenous blacks. What is meant though is that Australia must be essentially, overwhelmingly white. No muslims. No Africans. Having some Asians is alright, but significantly fewer than now.

Being Christian does not mean that everyone has to believe in God nor go to church. It does mean that Christian morality and cultural norms should dominate.

Why Not Same Sex Marriage (SSM)

It is ludicrous that the question is even being considered, but it is.

It should be enough to say that men marrying men is so ludicrous it should be dismissed out of hand, but that is not the world we live in.

So let us be specific. There are two reasons why not. The first is that marriage has meaning. If anyone can marry anyone then marriage has no meaning. If a man can marry a man then why not a man marry a boy? Or his sister? Or his dog? Why not?

But there is a deeper reason why not. Same sex marriage legitimises the illegitimate. A “gay” man is a man who fucks other men up the arse and sucks other men’s cocks. And vice versa. That is not a sexual orientation. That is a defect, an abomination, and I do not need the Bible to tell me that.

Colonisation by muslims

It matters that muslims wear islamic clothes - hijabs and burkhas for women, skull caps, robes and beards for men.

Firstly, wearing this attire is a political statement, an act of defiance - we will not fit in, we will live our way in your country. And we will make your country ours. Dressing this way is part of creating a Middle eastern Islamic world in Australia (and every where else). Colonisation, in other words.

Part of this colonisation is the building of mosques and schools. Whenever a mosque or school is built, a bit of Australia dies and is replaced by a bit of the Middle East.

When I was young.

Imagine walking down an Australian street and seeing no one but whites. So good, so peaceful.

Well that was what it was like when I was growing up. There were some abos and a very occasional Chinese but essentially, whites. Now walking down a street one sees wall-to-wall Asians, Africans and muslims and Christ knows who else.

We are the white abos now.

An invasion like no other

Since World War II, the First World has been invaded by the Third, and most dangerously by the muslims.  And what do parliamentary governments do?  Do they fight?  No. They opened the door to this invasion in the first place and now they wave in the muslims, and Africans and Asians et al.  They block attempts to repel the invaders.

Throughout human existence, governments have had to submit to overwhelming force but never before have they aided the invaders like this.  Never.

Sunny Uplands

Across the West, religion and belief in God are evaporating.  At last.  We are moving towards the sunny uplands of light and reason. Yet, as we move in that direction, coming up behind us is the darkness of Islam.

Goths and muslims

The Roman empire was invaded, conquered and destroyed by barbarians who swarmed in. Today, that future faces all the Western countries, with Europe at the forefront of the threat.

The similarities between then and now are striking.

The start of the end is precisely dated, AD 376. The western empire ended exactly a century later. The eastern half survived another millennium but it too succumbed to barbarian invaders, ultimately the muslim Turks.

In AD 376, Goths showed up at the Danube frontier and requested entry. At that moment, the Goths were not invaders. No, they were refugees, even asylum-seekers, who had been pushed west by the Huns.

The Romans did not want the Goths but they were in a difficult position. Local Roman military forces were minimal. The eastern emperor, Valens, and his army were in the Middle East, at Antioch, intending to fight the Persians.

The Romans had little choice. Some Goths were allowed in and as good a face as possible was put upon it. Very soon there was conflict though ancient sources blamed the Roman initially. Goths soon converted to invaders and, in AD 378, defeated and killed the eastern emperor at the Hadrianople.

That defeat was not inevitable but it happened, and the Romans never got on top of the situation, never able to push the Goths out inspite of strenuous military effort.

Two key points from then are pertinent today:  cohesiveness and leadership. Barbarians had been allowed to settle in the empire in the past but the Romans had always been in control. They dictated terms and could militarily smash barbarians who got out of line. Crucially, the Romans spread barbarians throughout the empire so they could not remain, or coalesce into, communities, nor have their own leaders.

But the Goths, and subsequent barbarian nations, did retain their cohesiveness. The Goths were able to establish kingdoms on Roman territory, territory they had alienated. Whole provinces were lost.

This is the threat that makes the muslims more dangerous than the other Third Worlders that have been streaming into Western countries since World War II. The muslims do not integrate. Instead, they build strong alien communities and are capable of throwing up leaders.

One last but very important point: the Goths who arrived at the Danube were a people - men, women and children - rather than an army as such. But they were still invaders, as the muslims et al are now.

It is not inevitable that the West will be conquered by the muslims, but it is looking dangerously likely. Time is running out.