Reading Brenton Tarrant’s The Great Replacement leaves me enormously impressed by this young man. He has a first class mind. Only twenty-eight and he has figured out, or learned, so much. His thinking is lucid, his ideas sound. Do I disagree with anything? There is one idea I do reject, even though his thinking is more logical than mine on this matter. There are a few actions or implementations he refers to which I consider wrong but they do not make the ideas behind them wrong. Overwhelmingly, both broadly and specifically, Brenton Tarrant is spot on.
Invasion
Tarrant’s first sentence is, “It’s the birthrates”. White birthrates are low, below replacement of the current generation by the next. Given that the world is overpopulated, a period of low birth rates is not a bad thing. Or it would be if everyone was doing it. Unfortunately, only the advanced races — whites, Chinese, Japanese and some other Asians and some South Americans — have low birthrates. The most backward, dangerous people in the world, that is to say the muslims and Africans, are breeding like animals. And they are the people invading white countries, and outbreeding the local whites.
Since World War II, the white countries have been swamped by other races and muslims. And by the Asians too. Don’t forget them. This is the greatest disaster we whites have ever experienced. The U.S. is within two or three decades of being minority white. (New York City and some states are already so.) We are all on the same path. We whites must fight back against the invasion of our white countries and the consequent replacement of whites. We must ethnically cleanse our countries. Perhaps outright genocide will be necessary.
Losing for what we fought.
We whites have created Western Civilisation, the greatest civilisation the world has ever seen, light years in advance of all others. And we have fought for it. But now? Now we are on the brink of losing it all.
Tarrant writes that he fights,
to avenge those European men and women lost in the constant and never ending wars of European history who died for their people only to have their lands given away to any foreign scum that bother to show up.
Dead right. Did Australian men fight and die at ANZAC Cove, or in the jungles of Papua-New Guinea, so that Australia could be handed over to the other races and muslims? Did the British heroically defeat the Germans in World War II to have their country invaded by Africans, muslims and Asians? That is what happened to Britain from 1948 onwards.
A few years ago I was watching the broadcast of the ANZAC Day ceremony from ANZAC Cove. A military bureaucrat said that the men had fought for diversity. Really? Some people need a bullet. Military organisations are full of woke bureaucrats.
How did we get to this point?
The neoliberals want to destroy nations and nation-states but they did not start the process and, even now, are not primarily responsible. We got here due to the incompetence of craven parliamentary politicians, parties and governments. (Here I am using “parliamentary” in its widest sense, to include the U.S. Congress, not just Westminster style.)
None of this was inevitable. There was no plan, just bungle after bungle. Then they came up with multiculturalism to cover up the disaster.
The two greatest, most disastrous problems we face:
The two problems are really the one, but with two faces, like opposite sides of the same coin. Without these problems, we would not be in the dire position we are, and we would be able to get out.
1 Governments not on our side
The first side of the problem: governments in white countries — excepting a few such those as in Eastern Europe — are not on our side. There have always been traitors who aided invaders but now whole governments, whole parties and whole political classes are not on the side of their own white people. Never before in history has this been the case, but it is now. Governments hold open the door for unwanted immigrants and refugees and attack whites who want to close the door, and reverse the flow.
It is though a great ocean liner has huge holes in the hull and the water is pouring in but the captain and officers on the bridge refuse to do anything about it. Instead they block sailors and passengers trying to plug the holes.
The white race and Western Civilisation cannot survive if we do not get rid of parliamentary government.
2 We are powerless
Forty or so years ago, I associated with the Trotskyites. The most important idea I took away was that no matter how many people — millions, hundreds of millions even — want or oppose something, it does not matter if they lack organisation and leadership. Parties and political leaders are supposed to provide that, but do not. Governments should fight the invaders, but do not. They are not on our side.
Liberalism and neo-liberalism
So, our own “leaders” and our own “elites” are against us. What ideology drives this attack on us, by people of our own race? Marxism, cultural or otherwise? Postmodernism? “Leftism” — a vague, catchall term? No, liberalism. Liberalism has subsumed all these others.
The default ideology of the white middle class is liberalism. And it is these people who control the institutions, public, private and educational. These people are by no means necessarily activists of liberalism — but liberalism is all they know.
Liberalism has gone rogue. Originally, liberalism was out to set people free — free us of kings, lords, clergy and their ilk. Great. But liberalism is like some machine or creature in a Hollywood movie. It started out with a good purpose, under human control, but it broke free and followed its own internal logic. (HAL in 2001 A Space Odyssey is a perfect example.)
Having destroyed the institutions that held us back, liberalism did not stop. It kept going, mindlessly destroying all institutions — the family, marriage, community, heterosexuality, nationality and the nation-state. And the liberals’ own race. Now, white liberals, the only sort there are, hate whites, their own civilisation, their own countries — and themselves.
Liberals want to throw open their countries to all the races, cultures and religions of the world. This, rather mindlessly, fits in with the second stream within liberalism, that which is now called neoliberalism or globalism. This stream’s original purpose was to set free the productive forces of the economy, forces powered by science and reason. Again, that was great at the time. Now, the neo-liberals want to destroy the nation-state. The nation-state was the first state which existed for the benefit of the mass of people. The nation-state is a threat to international capitalism because it can regulate capitalism, insist on fair wages and capture capital via taxes, spending that captured capital on the nation.
Open borders and mass immigration smash the nation-state and provide cheap labour. To the neo-liberals, a country is just a business with owners, managers, employees and customers.
Liberalism and neo-liberalism are what got us to where we are now. (To really understand modern liberalism, read Why Liberalism Failed by Patrick J. Deneen.)
Fascism?
The parliamentary governments have brought us to the very edge of hell, teetering on the precipice.
If the white countries are to survive, we need a period of fascism to clean up the mess created by the parliamentary governments and the liberals. That’s pretty scary. Fascists are pretty scary. But who else? Fascists will kill people who need to be killed. They will force out, or kill, the invaders.
Viktor Orban is doing a great job in Hungary without having to go all the way and being fascist. The eastern European nations are so lucky: they never went down the liberal pathway that other white countries did. One of the twos good thing the communist regimes did was keep their countries isolated from liberalism. The other was that, after the Second World War, they did not allow in the Third Worlders.
Liquidation of Leftism
I will revert to the term Leftism because, outside America, the term liberalism is not well understood.
If Leftism is to be liquidated, then Leftists must be. There is no other way. It is impossible to reason with Leftists. They are utterly unreachable, worse than religious nuts. A large scale massacre is not really necessary. That is good because most leftists are not evil people, inspite of their soft-headed ideas. Just hit the key players. Journalists would be top anyone’s list. Decimation in the precise sense of the word would seem about right. Put bosses of teacher training organisations high on the list too. In the case of academics, re-education in concentration camps might suit.
Then of course we must target those who come up with crazy ideas, ideas such as men marrying men, transgenderism, multiculturalism, … . A new lunacy arises everyday, each crazier than the last. The world was not like this once, not very long ago.
Disagreements, fundamental and partial.
Back to Tarrant. There are some issues I must deal with. Tarrant respects Anders Breivik. I do not. Breivik murdered sixty-nine young people, his own young people, Norwegians. I have read that he did it to attract attention to his manifesto. Hardly an adequate reason. His manifesto may well contain good ideas, very possibly ones I would agree with, but his manifesto was not worth those young lives. There is nothing worse than the death of the young, even the muslim young.
The young people Breivik murdered were members of the youth wing of the Norwegian Labor party, one of the mainstream parliamentary parties that are wrecking Norway. Clipping the next generation of party leaders was logical — but that does not balance out the wrongness of killing the young, especially the young of your own nation.
Shooting up mosques, muslims and parliamentary politicians is a different kettle of fish.
Tarrant mentions Dylann Roof, in passing, as one of us. In 2015, Roof killed nine black Christians at a church in Charleston, South Carolina. This quote from Roof is important,
I have no choice. I am not in a position to, alone, go into the ghetto and fight. I chose Charleston because it is (the) most historic city in my state, and at one time had the highest ratio of blacks to whites in the country. We have no skin heads, no real KKK, no one doing anything but talking on the internet. Well someone has to have the bravery to take it to the real world, and I guess it has to be me.
He is quite right is saying that we have no one to defend us. And he is right in saying that we need to get off the internet and take action in the real world. But he was wrong to kill these particular people, chosen because they were a soft target. They were innocent. They were descendants of slaves unwillingly brought to America. If he had attacked the Africans who had deliberately come to America, from Africa, in recent times, as refugees and immigrants — invaders — that would have been a different matter.
Roof was brave though. He knew and accepted the fatal personal consequences for himself. But he was still wrong.
Tarrant states that we must be prepared to kill the children of the invaders. I say No. Let’s quote Tarrant,
Children of invaders do not stay children, they become adults and reproduce, creating more invaders to replace your people. They grow up and vote against your people’s own wishes, for the interests of their own people and identity. They grow up and take the potential homes of your own people for themselves , they occupy positions of power, remove wealth and destroy social trust.
Any invader you kill, of any age, is one less enemy your children will have to face.
Would you rather do the killing, or leave it to your children? Your grandchildren?
Tarrant’s logic is indisputable, the consequences of inaction dire — but deliberately killing children is wrong, as wrong as can be. The Nazis were willing, and did deliberately kill children, though even they struggled with it. Rudolf Hoess, the commandant of Auschwitz, felt sick killing children — though he still did it. The Nazis overcame their qualms for Tarrant’s reason: children grow up.
I believe I could never overcome such qualms, and hope that I am never in a position where it is even and issue. In one sense though, not rounding up children and killing children is the easy thing. It is clear cut. The situations governments and peoples can face are not.
During World War II, the British bombed German cities deliberately targeting the civilians. All civilians of all ages. They could not have restricted themselves to mature adults, even if that had wanted to. The British did what needed be done because national survival was at stake.
There is a difference between deliberately killing children and accepting that children will be killed in a just war, but it is still killing children.
Today, Africans are invading Europe by boats. Not rescuing them from sinking boats, even deliberately sinking boats is what needs be done. But there are some children on some boats. So should letting them sink not be done, should the invaders be allowed to invade? It is not simple.
And killing the young is not just a matter of not killing children. The moral principle of not killing the young is wider. The “young” includes teenagers and twenty-somethings, who are the most common on the boats.
Ideally, one uses tough measures so as to avoid reaching the point where the question of killing the young arises. Dump Africans back on North African beaches. Intercept at sea or kick them out; no asylum appeals, nothing. But the parliamentary governments refuse to do sensible things and so now we are so far down the track that we must turn to the hard men to do hard things to save us.
Let’s consider some particular things Tarrant wrote or referred to:
- The El Paso shooting of August 2019. It was different. Patrick Crusius was not the usual nut. He targeted the enemy. He was a patriot fighting back against the Mexican invaders, which is why he let whites and blacks go. An article in the New York Times shortly afterwards said that the shooting really put the wind up the hispanics. Good. The article also stated that there were 56.5 million hispanics in the United States. The invaders are well and truly inside.
- Tarrant wrote admiringly of Oswald Mosley. Having only ever heard the official line, which is anti-Mosley, I cannot judge. I did like this quote though,
It will come in one way and one way alone, not through existing governments. Not by the manoeuvres of the lobbies and the parliaments and the congresses, it will come under the stress of necessity. It will come in a great wave of popularity, in a great awakening of the European soul.
And so it must if we whites are to survive.
- What has modern conservatism managed to conserve? Nothing. Dead right. Look at the Liberal and/or National parties here in Australia. What do they stand for, other than getting their bums in ministerial chairs? They could not even defeat Daniel Andrews and Labor in Victoria nor Annastacia Palaszczuk and Labor in Queensland, easy targets one would have thought. A conservative party, which stood for something, would have wiped their arses with these miserable opponents but the “conservative” parties are so empty.
Scott Morrison epitomises these parties. He is empty. He only won the 2019 election, and that narrowly, because his name was not Bill Shorten.
- Kill high profile traitors, writes Tarrant, and so we must. Merkel is top of Tarrant’s enemies list and rightly so. Angela Merkel has done more damage to Germany than Hitler. Germany recovered from Nazism within very few years. It could take centuries to reverse Merkel’s damage whereas the Nazi period itself ended on just one day, 8 April 1945.
You, me
Whilst you wait for a sign, a signal; someone to take up the spear; to cry out in alarm, your people wait on YOU.
Tarrant is right. We are all waiting for someone else. It has to be us, but few of us are up to being lone wolf direct actors. Few have the strength and courage, and I am not one of them. Though I have already had most of my life I do not have what it takes to face the remainder in prison.
There is a need for the lower level, but important, role of articulators, people who get out a lucid message that bypasses that of the liberals and mainstream media. That I would like to do. Tarrant’s manifesto is excellent but has been blocked.
Not comprehensive
Tarrant wrote so much on so many important matters. I have not commented on them all. Nor have I expressed all my own related ideas. There is no need to. There is just one last thing, Brenton Tarrant himself.
Why Brenton Tarrant matters
Brenton Tarrant is a hero. He gave the muslims a taste of their own medicine. He is a brave white man who fought back against the invaders. He frightened the muslims showing that we are not beaten and can fight, and fight hard. Brenton Tarrant deserves the Nobel Peace prize.
The parliamentary governments will never do what needs to be done. The fightback has to come from outside.
The question has to be asked is: can individual direct action achieve anything? Yes, but it will never be sufficient. But yes, it can start the ball rolling. To add momentum to the pendulum swings of history, as Tarrant writes. To start the fire, I would say.
There are hundreds of ethnic-patriotic parties in white countries but they are small. (Some particularly interesting parties exist in Scandinavia.) We need crises to provide a chance for some to come out the ruck and soar. Brenton Tarrant is a trailblazer for them, lighting a path forward for those that wish to follow.
We must follow. We whites must take back our countries. Now.
