Courtney Jayde Topic

Every day there are tragic deaths, sometimes due to evil but more often due to bad luck and the randomness of the world.  And then there are some deaths that should not happen, that are needless and avoidable.  One such death caught my attention back in 2015.

On 10 February of that year,  twenty-two year-old Courtney Jayde Topic was wrongly, unnecessarily and avoidably killed by a New South Wales police officer.

Courtney had some mental problems but she was not violent, aggressive or dangerous.  On the last day of her life she went to the Hungry Jack’s in West Hoxton, Sydney, and bought herself a dollar Coke.  For some reason she took a carving knife with her.  By time she walked outside, police had been called.  Significantly, the callers were concerned about harm to her, not others.  Courtney had not threatened anyone.

Forty-one seconds after the arrival of the police, Courtney was shot.  A taser had failed to fire, capsicum spray had done nothing but cause her pain, so she was shot by a young constable.  She had allegedly “lunged” forward with the knife - some ineffectual girlish lunge at worst.  More likely, blundering around, flailing, while blinded by the spray might be closer to the truth.

Courtney had not been threatening.  She was not a strong young man.  She was not some Amazon. She was not a commando.  Courtney was just a young girl needing the knife taken from her and taken home. 

The coroner opined that police needed in training in handing people with mental problems.  No.  What was needed on that day was for a policeman not to shoot, but to holster his gun, step forward, grab Courtney’s wrist and disarm her.  As Courtney was running back and forth, perhaps it would have required two policemen to do so, but two policemen were there, available.  (Three police were present, one a woman.)

That this should have been done, and was not, is the key point in this failure by the police and what makes the killing so needless.  Sickening.

Were the police in danger?  Mobile phone video shows Courtney being silly with the knife, but not aggressive.  The video shows her trying to run from capture, not attacking.  And if you are a police officer, surely some degree of risk goes with the territory.

The family tells of police being caring for Courtney as she died, and supportive of them.  Probably, the other police were shocked by the constable going off half-cocked, shooting.  But nonetheless the NSW Police closed ranks and the shooter was not disciplined, nor sacked, let alone prosecuted.  He got away with it.

That policeman took a young girl’s life.  If he had any decency, he would take his own.

 

References:

Courtney had a knife out in public but she didn’t deserve to die.  Good Weekend, Sydney Morning Herald, 16 June 2018

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/courtney-had-a-knife-out-in-public-but-she-didn-t-deserve-to-die-20180612-p4zkwy.html

https://www.cairnspost.com.au/news/national/raw-footage-of-courtney-topic-moments-before-she-was-fatally-shot-by-police/video/3c9acc8825c0b610f42a483e96b5cd1c

Muslims - Fightback

Our white countries are now full of muslims.

So what now?  Surrender or fight?  Or do we accept muslims in white countries as a done deal, too late to change?

There are so many muslims in Australia now that getting rid of them can seem a lost cause. But no, we must fight, we must not put fighting in the too hard box.  The consequences of failure are too dire, on a par with a German and Japanese victory in World War 2.  The muslims are as totalitarian and even more alien than the Japanese and Nazis. We would end up like blacks in Apartheid South Africa.

There can be no accommodation with muslims.  Unlike, say Buddhists, they takeover totally.

So, how do we fight?  Pauline Hanson said that we should not allow any more muslims into Australia. Pretty sensible.  That does not solve the problem of those here already but it is a start.  So what was Turnbull’s response? Australia has a non-discriminatory immigration policy, he haughtily declared. With leaders like that, no wonder we are in trouble.

Decades ago, when I associated with the Trotskyites, the most important thing they said was that countless people, millions, can oppose or want something but without leadership and organisation nothing happens. Dead right.

  

Parties and governments should be leading the fight, but are not.  Instead they side with the invaders, opposing those who want to fight the invaders.  Imagine in World War II, if Churchill had refused to fight the Battle of Britain and had the police arrest, and charge with hate crimes, those who wanted to fight.

Throughout history, there have always been individual traitors, but never before have whole governments, as those of the white countries are now, been on the enemy side.  (The Japanese and Chinese are not that stupid, are they?)

It would be nice to deal with this problem in a civilised way rather that a violent struggle, but governments block that.  It would be good if we were not so far down the track, but we are.

To whom can we turn?  To the Nazis?  Preferably not.  One of the leaders of Alternative for Germany, Bjorn Hocke, says to Germans, we are the last stop before you get to the Nazis.  No, not the Nazis.  Aside from the obvious reasons, they are not fit for purpose - they are still raving on about the Jews. Crazy.  Jews are on our side, part of Western civilisation. They should be recruited to the fight.

However, if we are to survive and take back our countries, we must turn to the hard men, men who will fight and kill.  

Chinese Invasion

THE SINICISATION OF AUSTRALIA.

Between 2011 and 2016 censuses, the Chinese population of Australia grew from 866,001 to 1,214, 438.  That is a lot in a population of only 24 million. The Chinese are not on a par with the muslims and Africans, of course, but it still matters very much.  As the aborigines can tell us, an invasion by any race or culture loses you your country.

I rather like the Chinese and am comfortable with them.  They are not alien like the muslims and Africans. Chinese do not breed like rabbits nor live off the taxpayer.  But numbers and groups matter. There is a world of difference between a small minority and a big minority - or a minority that becomes a majority.

The Chinese government sees overseas Chinese as an arm of the Chinese state and is already using them as such in Australia - bribing politicians (e.g. Sam Dastyari) and parties, protesting and lobbying, and Chinese front organisations. Might the Chinese government, in the not too distant future, demand that Australia take much bigger numbers of Chinese?

All this must leave Australian born Chinese conflicted but it is groups not individuals which matter.

What matters far more than the machinations of the Chinese government is that if some other race, religion or culture moves into a country, by invasion or migration, then it first changes the nature of the country. An Australia with an overwhelmingly white population is not the same country as one in which whites are just a minority.

Then, as the numbers grow, the country becomes the country of the invaders. We whites are well on the pathway to become white abos.

Our minds and focus are on the muslim threat but that does not mean that we can ignore the Chinese and Asian invasion. An Australia dominated by the Chinese would be light years better than one run by muslims but but it would still be a country we have lost. We must take back our country - from everyone.