Multiculturalism and Zubrzycki’s Pillars

Jerzy Zubrzycki is not a name that springs to mind. He is not, and was not, well known, but he was important. Professor Jerzy Zubrzycki was considered to be the architect of multiculturalism in Australia and, as such, he came up with four pillars:

1. social cohesion
2. equality of opportunity
3. obligations and rights that we all have
4. cultural identity.

Perfectly reasonable. Pretty obvious. We whites have no difficulty in accepting them. (I would say though that as a definition of a nation they are necessary but not sufficient, but that does not matter here.)

I saw Zubrzycki on television during the 1998 Federal election campaign. I recollect him admitting that that multiculturalism had failed. The reason being that too many of the groups entering Australia did not accept these pillars. 

Whites believe in tolerance and not being racist or discriminatory. The problem is that only whites think that way. White liberals are too stupid to understand that.

Ritchie Valens – left behind (written Feb 2012)

I love YouTube. I love the music videos, especially the black and whites from the Fifties and early Sixties. YouTube is like a time machine, allowing us to peer back into a long gone world. Still alive in that world is Ritchie Valens, the young singer who died, with Buddy Holly and Jiles ”the Big Bopper” Richardson, in a plane crash in 1959. The ghostly trio remains trapped in the Fifties forever, for all time.

Ritchie Valens’s career was short, but it had taken off: records released, television appearances, even a small part in a movie. Ritchie was on the fast track. Everything was going right for this youngster. But Ritchie’s career lasted at most a year, with only five months between the release of his first record and his death. Death cut him short, stole his future.

Looking at the images on the Internet, there are a few in which Ritchie Valens looks mature, much older than he was.  But he was only seventeen at the time, just a boy. In many photos he looks so young, even childlike. A seventeen year-old is still more of a child than a grown-up. That youngness was what grabbed my attention, locked onto my mind. One photo in particular made me so sad that I had to get up and walk away from the computer. Ritchie Valens was just too young to die.

But it is not just his youth that holds me. Listening to his young voice, his songs, looking at his happy images, he is just so alive, so full of life, with so much ahead of him. How can that suddenly cease to be? Be utterly gone?

And it was all so long ago, in another world. 1959 is so remote. It is not yesterday. So many years have passed since then. Ritchie Valens should have had all those years, and be 71 today. 

Time rolls on, leaving the dead behind, forever, as we move on without them. Trapped in the past for all eternity, the dead recede from us as though on a boat cut adrift from our ship. The Fifties are another world, a long gone world sealed off from the present, sealing off those who lived and died then. The Fifties are a million years ago.

Still being able to hear his ghostly voice, still singing La Bamba, Ritchie Valens still seems so alive. But it is an illusion, an Internet illusion. Ritchie Valens is long dead, long gone. Finished. He does not exist. But not so to his family. They have lovingly kept Ritchie’s memory alive, holding onto him. Being able to hear his voice still must make it so much harder to say goodbye, to let go of their young one, as he slips further and further away, separated from them forever on that little boat. He is so very distant now.

Ritchie Valens was not the only seventeen year-old who ever died, or even died that day. The young die every day. And Holly and Richardson were young too, only in their twenties. So was the pilot, the overlooked and forgotten twenty-one year-old Roger Peterson. I could just as well have written of them. Some young deaths, such as this one, catch my attention, but all are sad. How can something so wonderful as a young life be over, gone, forever? So much is lost, stolen. So much should have been, but never will be.

There is nothing more sad, more unfair, than the death of the young. Nothing. And nothing more wrong. It should not be.

So, goodbye Ritchie Valens – once so alive, so young, and now so long gone.

(3 February, 2012, was the 53^rd anniversary of that plane crash.)

Australia should be ...

Australia should be:

• white
• federal
• industrial and
• culturally Christian.

It does not have to be 100.00% white. And there are, of course, the indigenous blacks. What is meant though is that Australia must be essentially, overwhelmingly white. No muslims. No Africans. Having some Asians is alright, but significantly fewer than now.

Being Christian does not mean that everyone has to believe in God nor go to church. It does mean that Christian morality and cultural norms should dominate.

Why Not Same Sex Marriage (SSM)

It is ludicrous that the question is even being considered, but it is.

It should be enough to say that men marrying men is so ludicrous it should be dismissed out of hand, but that is not the world we live in.

So let us be specific. There are two reasons why not. The first is that marriage has meaning. If anyone can marry anyone then marriage has no meaning. If a man can marry a man then why not a man marry a boy? Or his sister? Or his dog? Why not?

But there is a deeper reason why not. Same sex marriage legitimises the illegitimate. A “gay” man is a man who fucks other men up the arse and sucks other men’s cocks. And vice versa. That is not a sexual orientation. That is a defect, an abomination, and I do not need the Bible to tell me that.

Colonisation by muslims

It matters that muslims wear islamic clothes - hijabs and burkhas for women, skull caps, robes and beards for men.

Firstly, wearing this attire is a political statement, an act of defiance - we will not fit in, we will live our way in your country. And we will make your country ours. Dressing this way is part of creating a Middle eastern Islamic world in Australia (and every where else). Colonisation, in other words.

Part of this colonisation is the building of mosques and schools. Whenever a mosque or school is built, a bit of Australia dies and is replaced by a bit of the Middle East.

When I was young.

Imagine walking down an Australian street and seeing no one but whites. So good, so peaceful.

Well that was what it was like when I was growing up. There were some abos and a very occasional Chinese but essentially, whites. Now walking down a street one sees wall-to-wall Asians, Africans and muslims and Christ knows who else.

We are the white abos now.

An invasion like no other

Since World War II, the First World has been invaded by the Third, and most dangerously by the muslims.  And what do parliamentary governments do?  Do they fight?  No. They opened the door to this invasion in the first place and now they wave in the muslims, and Africans and Asians et al.  They block attempts to repel the invaders.

Throughout human existence, governments have had to submit to overwhelming force but never before have they aided the invaders like this.  Never.

Sunny Uplands

Across the West, religion and belief in God are evaporating.  At last.  We are moving towards the sunny uplands of light and reason. Yet, as we move in that direction, coming up behind us is the darkness of Islam.

Goths and muslims

The Roman empire was invaded, conquered and destroyed by barbarians who swarmed in. Today, that future faces all the Western countries, with Europe at the forefront of the threat.

The similarities between then and now are striking.

The start of the end is precisely dated, AD 376. The western empire ended exactly a century later. The eastern half survived another millennium but it too succumbed to barbarian invaders, ultimately the muslim Turks.

In AD 376, Goths showed up at the Danube frontier and requested entry. At that moment, the Goths were not invaders. No, they were refugees, even asylum-seekers, who had been pushed west by the Huns.

The Romans did not want the Goths but they were in a difficult position. Local Roman military forces were minimal. The eastern emperor, Valens, and his army were in the Middle East, at Antioch, intending to fight the Persians.

The Romans had little choice. Some Goths were allowed in and as good a face as possible was put upon it. Very soon there was conflict though ancient sources blamed the Roman initially. Goths soon converted to invaders and, in AD 378, defeated and killed the eastern emperor at the Hadrianople.

That defeat was not inevitable but it happened, and the Romans never got on top of the situation, never able to push the Goths out inspite of strenuous military effort.

Two key points from then are pertinent today:  cohesiveness and leadership. Barbarians had been allowed to settle in the empire in the past but the Romans had always been in control. They dictated terms and could militarily smash barbarians who got out of line. Crucially, the Romans spread barbarians throughout the empire so they could not remain, or coalesce into, communities, nor have their own leaders.

But the Goths, and subsequent barbarian nations, did retain their cohesiveness. The Goths were able to establish kingdoms on Roman territory, territory they had alienated. Whole provinces were lost.

This is the threat that makes the muslims more dangerous than the other Third Worlders that have been streaming into Western countries since World War II. The muslims do not integrate. Instead, they build strong alien communities and are capable of throwing up leaders.

One last but very important point: the Goths who arrived at the Danube were a people - men, women and children - rather than an army as such. But they were still invaders, as the muslims et al are now.

It is not inevitable that the West will be conquered by the muslims, but it is looking dangerously likely. Time is running out.